Leo XIV says “I never wanted to be Pope, not when I was younger and not when I was older, but when the Lord calls you have to say yes”
"Beda, ak vás budú všetci ľudia chváliť, lebo to isté robili ich otcovia falošným prorokom." Luk.6:24
Tampoco eres el Papa ni cardenal ni obispo, aunque te vistas como tal mientras desafías las leyes de Dios y contradices a Cristo.
Treffen sich hier Satanisten oder wie ist es zu erklären, wie unser Papst permanent mit Füssen getreten wird?
Kein Papst wollte diese überirdische Verantwortung tragen, sie hatten es nur nicht gesagt.
@viatorem: Die Menschen sehnen sich nach einem Papst und sind voll Schmerz, wenn sie erkennen müssen, wenn ihnen jemand präsentiert wird, der ihnen nicht die reine Lehre Christi und der katholischen Kirche überbringt, sich also nicht als wahrer Lehrer oder Hirte der Kirche erweist!
„Nikdy som nechcel byť pápežom“: Dnes v augustiniánskej farnosti sv. Augustína v Barcelone vyslovil Lev XIV. známu vetu, ktorú často počujeme od kariéristov: „Nikdy som nechcel byť pápežom – ani keď som bol mladší, ani keď som bol starší –, ale keď Pán volá, musíte povedať áno.“
Na to,že nechcel byť pápežom sa tej úlohy bravúrne zhostil a užíva si status celosvetovej cebrity ,všetku tú slávu a popularitu ,ako Tom Hanks
Milujú ho všetci od politických elít ,mainstreamových médií ,ktoré ho nenazývajú inak ,len "svätý otec" ,až po to nadšené ,osprostené a oklamané stádo.
"Beda, ak vás budú všetci ľudia chváliť, lebo to isté robili ich otcovia falošným prorokom" Luk.6:24
«Nunca quis ser Papa»: Hoje, na Paróquia Agostiniana de Santo Agostinho, em Barcelona, Leão XIV proferiu uma frase habitual entre os carreiristas: «Nunca quis ser Papa — nem quando era mais novo, nem quando já era mais velho — mas quando o Senhor chama, é preciso dizer sim.»
„Nigdy nie chciałem zostać papieżem”: Dzisiaj w parafii św. Augustyna w Barcelonie Leon XIV wypowiedział znane zdanie, które często słyszy się z ust karierowiczów: „Nigdy nie chciałem zostać papieżem – ani w młodości, ani w starszym wieku – ale kiedy Pan wzywa, trzeba powiedzieć »tak«”.
Różowiutki jak kwiatuszek, ale do niewinnego kwiatuszka mu daleko, bo często Panu Bogu mówi ,,nie,, (a to sodomia czy wielobóstwo)
„Nigdy nie chciałem zostać papieżem” - no i jest jak chciał.
Jeśli marzył, by być clownem, też by mu się udało...
«Non ho mai voluto diventare Papa»: oggi, nella parrocchia agostiniana di Sant’Agostino a Barcellona, Leone XIV ha pronunciato una frase tipica che spesso si sente dire dai carrieristi: «Non ho mai voluto diventare Papa – né da giovane né da anziano – ma quando il Signore chiama, bisogna dire di sì».
„Soha nem akartam pápa lenni”: Ma a barcelonai Szent Ágoston-templomban XIV. Leó egy olyan mondatot mondott, amelyet gyakran hallani a karrieristáktól: „Soha nem akartam pápa lenni – sem fiatalabb koromban, sem idősebb koromban –, de amikor az Úr hív, igent kell mondani.”
« Je n’ai jamais voulu être pape »: Aujourd’hui, à la paroisse augustinienne Saint-Augustin de Barcelone, Léon XIV a prononcé une phrase familière que l’on entend souvent de la bouche des carriéristes : « Je n’ai jamais voulu être pape – ni dans ma jeunesse, ni à un âge plus avancé –, mais quand le Seigneur appelle, il faut dire oui. »
Il serait plutôt étonnant que l'accession à la papauté fût une ambition nourrie depuis l'enfance.
„Ich wollte nie Papst werden“: Heute äußerte Leo XIV. in der Augustinerpfarrei St. Augustinus in Barcelona einen Satz, den man oft von Karrieristen hört: „Ich wollte nie Papst werden – weder in meiner Jugend noch im Alter –, aber wenn der Herr ruft, muss man Ja sagen.“
so eine verlogene Ratte! Anbei JA er sagt ausnahmsweise die Wahrheit, denn er IST TATSÄCHLICH NICHT DER PAPST, SONDERN DER USURPATOR
Hier fragt man sich jedoch WER der "Herr" des Besatzers des HEILIGEN STUHLES ist. Sicher nicht unser HERR JESUS CHRISTUS!
@Ad Orientem Der AC ist ein System, keine Person!! Erbärmlich! Lieber Peter Thiel, die meisten …
Die einzigen Herren, die dem Okkupator Prevost gerufen und gezielt befördert haben, waren Bergoglio und Parolin. Er ist ein unverschämter Lügner, denn er weiß ganz genau, dass er gemäß eines Kompromisses mit Bergoglio installiert wurde. Alles vorgeplant. Sogar sein eigener Bruder gibt es öffentlich zu. Quellen: Der Bruder von Leo XIV: "Er stand Franziskus … Bericht: "Prevost war der einzige Kandidat von … "Franziskus wollte Kardinal Robert Prevost als seinen Nachfolger" Andrea Riccardi: "Leo XIV. ist kein Anti- … Die Papstmacher waren die Bergoglio-"Kardinäle" Kardinalsgeschwätz: "Die von Franziskus ….
@elisabethvonthüringen Der AC ist sehr wohl eine Person, eine teuflische dazu und wird das System beherrschen und hierrüber das dürfen Sie mir gerne glauben, bin ich gut informiert
Der Pachamama-Anbeter, der Sodomie vorantreibt: vorgetäuschte "Demut", genau gleich wie Bergoglio.
«Nunca quise ser Papa»: Hoy, en la parroquia agustina de San Agustín de Barcelona, León XIV pronunció una frase habitual entre los ambiciosos: «Nunca quise ser Papa —ni de joven ni de mayor—, pero cuando el Señor llama, hay que decir que sí».
Los masones lo llamaron para usurpar el Trono Petrino (ver mensaje:2025-09-02 Reconquista - No es Mío | MISIÓN DE … ) y ahí está, como bergoglio haciendo el hipócrita
Es verdad, no quiso ser papa sino un falso papa elegido por los falsos cardenales bergoglianos, Además, aunque lo oculte y engañe a casi todo el mundo, no es el Papa
Hipócrita de milésima categoría! Se burla de todos sus ciegos seguidores y esconde que él fue instalado por Bergoglio y Parolin. Todo preprogramado según un compromiso con Bergoglio que lo hizo obispo y después pseudocardenal. Él sabe muy bien que NO es Papa. Caradura!
"but when the Lord calls you..." When the Communist Party calls, the pope also answers!
"Never Wanted to Be Pope": Today, at the Augustinian Parish of St. Augustine in Barcelona, Leo XIV delivered a familiar line often heard from careerists: “I never wanted to be Pope - not when I was younger and not when I was older - but when the Lord calls, you have to say yes.”
The Freemasons called him to usurp the Petrine Throne (see message: 2025-09-02 Reconquest - He Is Not Mine | Mission … ) and there he is, like Bergoglio, playing the hypocrite
It's true, he didn't want to be pope but a false pope chosen by the false Bergoglian cardinals. Furthermore, although he hides it and deceives almost everyone, he is not the Pope.
11.06.2026
Morally, Pope Leo, the cardinals and bishops, must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. There is only the honest option now.
Vatican agrees that cardinals Fernandez, Zuppi. Semeraro and Archbishop Forte are in schism on the Nicene Creed etc. There is no denial.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Melloni and Riccardi is schismatic and dishonest. We have a rational and honest version now.
NEW DISCOVERY
There is a new discovery in the Catholic Church. It is: LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only in 2026. It means Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442. While LG 8, 14, 16 etc are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 and EENS. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger kept this information a secret. He did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that the Council could be interpreted with LG 8, 14, 15 etc being invisible and so Vatican Council II would be ecclesiocentric and traditional. Instead he excommunicated Lefebvre and the new bishops for not affirming Vatican Council II irrational with LG 8, 14, 16 allegedly visible.
So now we know that we can interpret the Nicene Creed with LG 16 visible or invisible and the conclusion will be different. With LG 16 we have a new version and so schism. With LG 16 invisible we have orthodoxy.
If Pope Leo interpreted Vatican Council II, the Creeds, etc with LG 16 invisible there would be the hermeneutic of continuity with all Tradition. But when he continues to use LG 16 visible premise there is schism, a hermeneutic of discontinuity with the past de fide teachings, the deposit of the faith.
With LG 16 visible, cardinals Fernandez, Zuppi and Semeraro and Archbishop Bruno Forte are in schism. The original interpretation of the Nicene Creed was with the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I.) was as being invisible cases. I interpret the Nicene Creed, with LG 16 invisible.
So Alberto Melloni and Andrea Riccardi interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms irrationally and schismatically. I choose the rational and orthodox option.
INVISIBLE- VISIBLE DISTINCTION
Whenever someone says that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition; with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal, they imply that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to visible cases in the present times. Invisible people cannot be exceptions for EENS etc.So we have to make the invisible-visible distinction.
For me LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to invisible cases. This is something obvious. It is common knowledge. It was common sense over the centuries. If anyone is saved outside the Catholic Church without faith and baptism, it can only be known to God. Defacto, practically, there are no such cases known to us on earth.
So this is the great discovery- LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are always physically invisible. But this was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the bishops he ordained. It was not also known to the liberals at that time. Cardinal Ratzinger was in schism with LG 16 visible and so also Pope Paul VI and Cardinal Ottaviani. But so also Archbishop Lefebvre who was using the LG 16 visible premise as does Fr. Davide Pagliarani today.
With Vatican Council II rational (LG 16 invisible) there no more is the traditionalist-liberal division. The polarization comes with LG 16 visible. The Council is no more liberal with LG 16 invisible.
It means cardinals Hollerich, Grech, McElroy, Radcliffe, Semeraro, Fernandez, Cupich and the other liberal cardinals, are in schism today.
If Pope Leo interprets Vatican Council II with the invisible premise he would cease to be schismatic. He would be magisterial and apostolic on Vatican Council II, the Councils, Creeds, and Catechisms. The norm would be a Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, with LG 16 invisible.
Over the centuries they interpreted being saved in I.I and BOD rationally. But in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney, BOD and I.I were mistaken as being visible cases. Then it was concluded wrongly that BOD and I.I were objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This was the EENS of the Church Councils which defined EENS, and did not mention any known exceptions.
Now we know that the Athanasius Creed, which says all need to be Catholic for salvation, does not have any exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II.
The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus does not have explicit exceptions in BOD and I.I.
It means the whole Church must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and affirm the Athanasius Creed and dogma EENS. This includes the liberal cardinals and bishops.
ONE HONEST OPTION ONLY
Morally, Pope Leo, the cardinals and bishops, must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This is the honest option.
We can now choose the hermeneutic of continuity or discontinuity with Tradition. It is as simple as switching a light switch on or off.
With LG 16 invisible, the SSPX can seek canonical recognition. The Council supports Tradition. There is no change in faith and morals, since the ecclesiology has not changed. The Council is no more controversial for the traditionalists.
Vatican Council II is no more a rupture with the Syllabus of Pius IX, the Catechism of Pius X and the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. Mission is ecclesiocentric as it was for the founders of the Jesuit community in the Midde Ages.
The Council is now aligned with the concept of EENS of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA.
The approved Ecclesia Dei communities can no more continue to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 16 visible.Lionel Andrades